Jump to content

[1.13.2] Compilation error mismatch between IDEA and javac


Choonster

Recommended Posts

In TestMod3, I have a series of packets for updating item capability data in Containers. Because they all operate in similar ways, they all extend a generic base class and their static encode/decode/handle methods all call corresponding generic static methods in the base class.

 

I've run into a strange issue with the decode methods where IDEA can infer the type arguments and doesn't want me to explicitly specify them, but the compiler can't infer the type arguments and generates a compilation error.

 

You can see an example of a decode method without explicit type arguments here, which generates this compilation error:

TestMod3_1.13.2\src\main\java\choonster\testmod3\network\capability\fluidhandler\MessageBulkUpdateContainerFluidTanks.java:49: error: incompatible types: cannot infer type-variable(s) HANDLER,DATA,MESSAGE
		return MessageBulkUpdateContainerCapability.decode(
		                                                  ^
    (argument mismatch; cannot infer functional interface descriptor for MessageFactory<HANDLER,FluidTankInfo,MESSAGE>)
  where HANDLER,DATA,MESSAGE are type-variables:
    HANDLER extends Object declared in method <HANDLER,DATA,MESSAGE>decode(PacketBuffer,CapabilityDataDecoder<DATA>,MessageFactory<HANDLER,DATA,MESSAGE>)
    DATA extends Object declared in method <HANDLER,DATA,MESSAGE>decode(PacketBuffer,CapabilityDataDecoder<DATA>,MessageFactory<HANDLER,DATA,MESSAGE>)
    MESSAGE extends MessageBulkUpdateContainerCapability<HANDLER,DATA> declared in method <HANDLER,DATA,MESSAGE>decode(PacketBuffer,CapabilityDataDecoder<DATA>,MessageFactory<HANDLER,DATA,MESSAGE>)

 

However, adding the explicit type arguments (like this) causes IDEA to recommend removing them, as shown in this screenshot:

497590249_2019-06-10-TestMod3ContainerCapabilityUpdateMessage-Explicittypeargumentscanbeinferred.PNG.a9ebf92ed01a28e8fc034e479b4deefc.PNG

 

Does anyone know what would cause this mismatch, or if there's a way to avoid the explicit type arguments here?

Edited by Choonster

Please don't PM me to ask for help. Asking your question in a public thread preserves it for people who are having the same problem in the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Announcements



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.